A large fraction of the particles produced by fragmentation are
unstable and subsequently decay into the observable stable (or
almost stable) ones. It is therefore important to include all
particles with their proper mass distributions and decay properties.
Although involving little deep physics, this is less trivial than
it may sound: while a lot of experimental information is available,
there is also very much that is missing. For charm mesons,
it is necessary to put together measured exclusive branching ratios
with some inclusive multiplicity distributions to obtain a consistent
and reasonably complete set of decay channels, a rather delicate
task. For bottom even less is known, and for some
baryons only
a rather simple phase-space type of generator has been used for hadronic
decays.
Normally it is assumed that decay products are distributed according to phase space, i.e. that there is no dynamics involved in their relative distribution. However, in many cases additional assumptions are necessary, e.g. for semileptonic decays of charm and bottom hadrons one needs to include the proper weak matrix elements. Particles may also be produced polarized and impart a non-isotropic distribution to their decay products. Many of these effects are not at all treated in the program. In fact, spin information is not at all carried along, but has to be reconstructed explicitly when needed.
This normal decay treatment makes use of a set of tables where
branching ratios and decay modes are stored. It encompasses all
hadrons made out of
,
,
,
and
quarks, and also
the leptons. The decay products are hadrons, leptons and photons.
Some
states are sufficiently heavy that they are allowed to
decay to partonic states, like
, which
subsequently fragment, but these are exceptions.
You may at will change the particle properties, decay channels or
branching ratios of the above particles. There is no censorship what is
allowed or not allowed, beyond energy-momentum and (electrical and
colour) charge conservation. There is also no impact e.g. on the cross
section of processes, since there is no way of knowing e.g. if the
restriction to one specific decay of a particle is because that decay
is of particular interest to us, or because recent measurement have
shown that this indeed is the only channel. Furthermore, the number of
particles produced of each species in the hadronization process is not
known beforehand, and so cannot be used to correctly bias the preceding
steps of the generation chain. All of this contrasts with the class of
`resonances' described above, in section
.