The shower routine, as described above, is optimized for two objects
forming the showering system, within which energy and momentum should
be conserved. However, occasionally more than two initial objects are
given, e.g. if one would like to consider the subclass of
events in order to study angular correlations
as a test of the coupling structure of QCD. Such events are generated in
the showering of normal
events, but not with high
efficiency within desired cuts, and not with the full angular structure
included in the shower. Therefore four-parton matrix elements may be the
required starting point but, in order to `dress up' these partons, one
nevertheless wishes to add shower emission. A possibility to start from
three partons has existed since long, but only with [And98a] was
an approach for four parton introduced, and with the possibility to
generalize to more partons, although this latter work has not yet been
done.
The basic idea is to cast the output of matrix element generators in the form of a parton-shower history, that then can be used as input for a complete parton shower. In the shower, that normally would be allowed to develop at random, some branchings are now fixed to their matrix-element values while the others are still allowed to evolve in the normal shower fashion. The preceding history of the event is also in these random branchings then reflected e.g. in terms of kinematical or dynamical (e.g. angular ordering) constraints.
Consider e.g. the
case. The
matrix-element expression contains contributions from five graphs,
and from interferences between them. The five
graphs can also be read as five possible parton-shower histories for
arriving at the same four-parton state, but here without the
possibility of including interferences. The relative probability for
each of these possible shower histories can be obtained from the rules
of shower branchings. For example, the relative probability for the
history where
, followed by
and
, is given by:
![]() |
(182) |
| (183) | |||
![]() |
(184) | ||
![]() |
Variants on the above probabilities are imaginable. For instance, in
the spirit of the matrix-element approach we have assumed a common
for all graphs, which thus need not be shown,
whereas the parton-shower language normally assumes
to be a function of the transverse momentum of each branching.
One could also include information on azimuthal anisotropies.
The relative probability
for each of the five possible
parton-shower histories can be used to select one of the possibilities
at random. (A less appealing alternative would be a `winner takes
all' strategy, i.e. selecting the configuration with the largest
.) The selection fixes the values of the
,
and
at two vertices. The azimuthal angle
is defined
by the daughter
parton orientation around the mother direction. When the conventional
parton-shower algorithm is executed, these values are then forced on the
otherwise random evolution. This forcing cannot be exact for the
values, since the final partons given by the matrix elements are on the
mass shell, while the corresponding partons in the parton shower might
be virtual and branch further. The shift between the
wanted and the obtained
values are rather small, very seldom
above
. More significant are the changes of the opening
angle between two daughters: when daughters originally assumed
massless are given a mass the angle between them tends to be reduced.
This shift has a non-negligible tail even above 0.1 radians. The
`narrowing' of jets by this mechanism is compensated by the
broadening caused by the decay of the massive daughters, and thus
overall effects are not so dramatic.
All other branchings of the parton shower are selected at random
according to the standard evolution scheme. There is an upper
limit on the non-forced masses from internal logic, however.
For instance, for four-parton matrix elements, the singular
regions are typically avoided with a cut
, where
is
the square of the minimal scaled invariant mass between any pair of
partons. Larger
values could be used for some purposes, while
smaller ones give so large four-jet rates that the need to
include Sudakov form factors can no longer be neglected.
The
cut roughly corresponds to
GeV at LEP 1
energies, so the hybrid approach must allow branchings at least
below 9 GeV in order to account for the emission missing from the
matrix-element part. Since no 5-parton emission is generated by the
second-order matrix elements, one could also allow a threshold
higher than 9 GeV in order to account for this potential emission.
However, if any such mass is larger than one of the forced masses,
the result would be a different history than the chosen one, and one
would risk some doublecounting issues. So, as an alternative,
one could set the minimum invariant mass between any of the four
original partons as the maximum scale of the subsequent shower
evolution.